Jan 6 Hearings Tv Ratings: Twenty million people watched the House of Representatives January 6 committee’s broadcast sessions on Thursday night. On ABC and MSNBC, the two-hour hearings on last year’s Capitol storming drew the biggest audiences. The live broadcasts were carried by more than a dozen cable and broadcast networks. From 8 to 10 p.m. ET, Fox News had a consistent audience, but MSNBC and CNN drew much more viewers than usual.
According to Nielsen, 20.04 million people watched the two-hour broadcast (excluding PBS, whose data were unavailable at the time of publication). ABC averaged 5.22 million viewers during the two-hour broadcast. MSNBC came in second with 4.3 million viewers, trailing NBC (3.7 million), CBS (3.49 million), and CNN (2.74 million). The Season 2 Premiere of ‘P- Valley’ attracted a large number of viewers for Starz. The proceedings were watched by slightly under 600,000 people on CNBC, CNN, NBC LX, Newsmax, and NewsNation. With a 0.93 percent rating among adults 25-54, ABC came out on top. NBC received a 0.69 rating, CNN 0.61, CBS 0.55, and MSNBC 0.51.
The hearings were not shown in their entirety on Fox News, instead electing to screen their regular opinion programming throughout primetime. Carlson, Tucker Between 8 and 10 p.m., Hannity got 3.06 million viewers and a 0.45 rating in the 25-54 demographic. Fox Business’ two-hour political coverage, which had an average audience of 240,000 viewers, was hosted by Bret Baier, Fox News’ chief political commentator. The NHL Eastern Conference Finals game four on ESPN drew 2.48 million people, making it the most-watched primetime show outside of news coverage. It was also the most popular show (0.82 ratings) among adults 18-49 and 25-54. (0.96).
The Committee Hearings on January 6
The Committee Hearings on January 6 are a must-see television event, according to the Observer’s Notebook.
On the first night, the must-see TV event of the summer began with compelling evidence, emotive testimony, and terrifying pictures. Suspense, drama, and a gripping story with direct historical, political, and moral implications have a new show to watch. With terrifying imagery and heartbreaking statements, the opening “episode” of the Jan. 6 hearings powerfully depicted one of America’s darkest days.
It’s unclear whether the coming weeks will have any impact on a population that appears to have settled into one of two factions. Those who are ready to keep an open mind, however, will find much to take in just on the first episode. The hearing was broadcast live on broadcast and cable news networks because it was deemed important enough. Fox was the one exception to this rule since it stuck to its regularly scheduled primetime programming. It makes sense to listen to Tucker Carlson if he has new knowledge to provide on important national issues like testicular tanning.
A text from Sean Hannity was read during the first session, and I’m sure we’ll hear about other texts from Fox personalities during the subsequent hearings. The committee’s chairman, Bennie Thompson, a Democrat from Mississippi, had the opportunity to make the opening remarks. With her polite remarks, Liz Cheney’s carefully controlled but obviously heard wrath immediately ignited the proceedings. Cheney’s Republican colleagues have ignored her as a result of her outspoken stance.
The committee probing the attack on Trump supporters by Trump supporters on January 6, 2021, is holding rare primetime hearings. The occurrence caused a brief interruption in regular programming on ABC, CBS, and NBC. Nielsen’s data includes people who watch traditional television or Internet-connected televisions, but do not social media consumption. Furthermore, the Fox News Channel (FOXA.O), which elected to run its regular opinion programming during the hearing, isn’t counted among the attendees.
Barr may not have grasped Trump’s absurd claims
At the session, video footage from interviews with a number of Trump supporters was aired, including former Attorney General Bill Barr, who described confronting the former president about his claims that the election had been rigged. Barr may not have grasped Trump’s absurd claims regarding voting technology because he used legal lingo like “bullshit,” “nonsense,” and “crazy stuff” to describe them.)
Washington’s ex-golden couple, Jared and Ivanka, were also briefly seen in video footage, which was shown in close-up. Ivanka’s statement that she trusted Barr’s judgment is wonderful. Jared, on the other hand, was upset by former White House attorney Pat Cipollone’s threats to resign rather than support Trump’s false allegations. Despite his past stature as one of the country’s most powerful people, Jared now acknowledges, “I kind of took it up as simply complaining,” revealing yet another tragedy of his former position. Fox Business Network broadcasted the hearing live. 15.2 million of the 20 million viewers were 55 or older, according to Nielsen. Only a small percentage of people aged 18 to 34 watched the broadcasts.
While words are vital, the members of the committee recognized that visuals are more so. As a result, 12 minutes of footage of insurgents invading the Capital was included. An eyewitness account of the day’s events, including Trump’s covert meeting in the White House with Sidney Powell, Michael Flynn, and Rudy Giuliani, reinforced Trump’s claim to have orchestrated it. Not to mention his tweet from December 2020, in which he asked people to come to a rally in New Hampshire on January 6th. He promised that it would be a crazy ride.
Proud Boys for weeks before the incident
At this evening’s gathering, prominent witnesses included a Capitol Police officer who was critically injured while protecting the nation’s capital and a documentary filmmaker who had been embedded with the Proud Boys for weeks before the incident. Edwards reported her “genuine blood, sweat, and tears” on the day of the race. After learning they were heavily outnumbered, she told her commanding officer, “I think we’re going to need a couple more folks down here.” On the other hand, “you’ll need a bigger boat” is an exaggeration.
Quested provided vital testimony about the Proud Boys’ and Oath Keepers’ coordinated tactics in the weeks preceding up to their demonstration on January 6. The British filmmaker diluted the weight of his report with tiny details like “I witnessed how the throng transformed from protestors to rioters to insurrectionists.” His team’s pre-riot hotel was described as “not as satisfactory as we wanted,” and they dined at Tucker’s Restaurant in Washington, D.C., putting the adage “any publicity is good PR” to the test.
Cheney realized that if the presentation went on too long, viewers would lose interest, so he devised a creative strategy to keep them interested by dropping hints about what would happen next. It is believed that, like Watergate, these hearings would act as a catalyst for reform in America. At the moment, we’re living in a very different, much more fractured America. We can still hope if only a few people are stirred by the horrific information given.
And that we can live up to Benjamin Franklin’s statement when asked what form of government he and his fellow Constitutional Convention participants had built: “A republic if you can retain it.” Of sure, we could use a bigger boat. In 2019, around 14 million people tuned in to watch Trump’s first televised impeachment hearing across ten networks. It took place during the day when individuals are less inclined to watch television.
