Who Voted In The Supreme Court Today: The United States of America Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade! American media coverage of abortion as of June 24: The Supreme Court’s decision to reverse nearly 50 years of Abortion rights has drawn criticism from Joe Biden. The Supreme Court of the United States has overturned the important Roe v. Wade ruling, ending nearly five decades of American access to abortion. According to a unanimous 6-3 ruling by the conservative majority of the Supreme Court, there is no “right to abortion” in the US Constitution.
https://twitter.com/TheOnion/status/1540414069269823488
The Supreme Court’s decision, according to Biden, was “a terrible day” for the United States. Millions of American women may not be able to receive abortion treatments, according to pro-choice activists. Democrats are outraged by a senator’s decision to support conservative candidates for justice on the Supreme Court. A US senator who cast crucial votes to confirm conservative Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn Roe has drawn criticism from progressive campaigners. Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, a supporter of Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, argued in her dissent that the court’s decision went against what “Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and meetings with me,
Where they both insisted on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon.” Rachel Irwin, a supporter of Vice President Joe Biden’s policy agenda, tweeted, “Susan Collins OWNS this. (fisheries.org) ” What she leaves us with is this. Greg Kesich, an editor of the Portland Press Herald newspaper in Maine, claimed that Susan Collins “could have stopped this, but she didn’t even try.” Democrats would have a somewhat higher chance of winning the Senate if there were a less politicized vote for Brown Jackson’s confirmation.
Three Republican senators voted in favor of Ketanji
Three Republican senators voted in favor of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation to the Supreme Court yesterday, making it the most polarised confirmation vote since Justice Neil Gorsuch’s nomination in 2017. In order to appoint the first black woman to a federal appellate court in American history, Murkowski, Romney, and Collins joined 50 Democrats and Independents in the Senate. Data from reporting by the Washington Post, The New York Times, and Politico show that the confirmation of Supreme Court justices has become more politicized over the past 20 years.
The tendency peaked under the administration of President Trump. The Senate approved Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court justice after 151 years, according to the New York Times, without the backing of a minor party. Coney Barrett, Trump’s third candidate for the Supreme Court, was the first to take the place of a departing liberal justice, changing the court’s composition to three liberals and six conservatives. As Justice Stephen Breyer, a liberal on the Supreme Court is being replaced, Brown Jackson’s selection is anticipated to keep the court’s present balance.
When Antonin Scalia passed away in 2016, it was hoped that the Senate, which was then under Republican control, would allow a vote on his replacement. However, they prevented it for about nine months until Donald Trump was elected, which raised questions about the Republican Party’s decision to rush through Coney Barrett’s vote right before the 2020 election. The Supreme Court has recently ruled in favor of the Affordable Care Act, despite its conservative bent, as conservative Chief Justice John Roberts is perceived to have become a voice of moderation, and Trump appointees have demonstrated their willingness to side with liberals in a number of cases.
Both of these legislation, in Alito’s opinion, had little or no effect on how accessible elections were to all eligible voters. He claimed that Arizona law made voting “very simple.” According to a lower court decision, on election day, voters of Native American, Hispanic, and Black heritage cast around 1% of their ballots in the incorrect precinct. A program that “appears to operate for 98 percent of the voters to whom it applies minority and non-minority alike is unlikely to make the system unequally open,” according to Alito.
Supreme Court maintained Arizona’s voting regulations
Republicans were successful in getting the Supreme Court to support voting restrictions in Arizona that Democrats had said were unjust. The Supreme Court maintained Arizona’s Republican-backed voting regulations on Thursday by a 6-3 majority, despite Democratic claims that they were biased against the state’s Native American, Hispanic, and Black electorate. Due to their disproportionate impact on minorities, two voting laws in Arizona were found to be in violation of the Voting Rights Act by a federal appeals court. No decision violated any civil rights statutes, concluded Justice Samuel Alito in the majority opinion.
One of the precautions in place is the “out-of-precinct policy,” which disqualifies ballots cast on election day outside the precinct. The second bill, the “ballot collection statute,” prohibits anyone who is not a family member from collecting and distributing ballots. Conservatives refer to this practice as “ballot harvesting.” Both plans were opposed by the DNC in accordance with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which demands that people of all racial backgrounds be able to participate in elections. The Democratic National Committee won its appeal, according to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
A full appeals court judgment from 2013 stated that out-of-precinct voting disadvantages Native American, Hispanic, and Black voters in Arizona. The court concluded that racial bias was at the heart of the ballot collection law’s approval because of the “cumulative and clear indication” provided by the events surrounding the law’s passage. Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Alito in the majority of the court, as did Chief Justice John Roberts. Democratic nominees for the bench, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor, all express disagreement.
Is there anything the Supreme Court under Trump hasn’t done?
Since President Trump’s reorganization, this is the US Supreme Court that leans the most to the right. The Supreme Court may turn even more conservative in the upcoming months as a result of the passing of liberal jurist Ruth Bader Ginsburg. With a 5-4 split in favor of conservatives, the president’s first two bench selections have already tilted the ideological balance to the right. Just two of the many intensely contested issues on which the Supreme Court of the United States deals are gun rights and abortion.
There are nine justices on the Supreme Court, and two of them, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, were chosen by President Trump. As such, their appointment was eagerly awaited. We look at five closely watched cases from this year’s term to see if this conservative-leaning court really did vote that way.
Abortion
When the Supreme Court declared in June that Louisiana’s law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at local hospitals was unconstitutional, there were no longer any abortion providers in the state. Progressives and pro-choice activists applauded Justice Roberts’ decision, which supported the court’s liberal majority.
The future of reproductive rights in the US caught many people’s attention when Kavanaugh was nominated to the Supreme Court last year. Many were concerned that, now that the conservative majority had been established, landmark decisions, including Roe v. Wade, which supported a woman’s right to an abortion, may be reversed.
