Vans trek slip on review: Vans famous skate Sneakers have been adored for over 50 years by everyone from high school students to office commuters to genuine skaters. Its canvas, on the other hand, isn’t exactly waterproof. That all changed this spring when the company released the Trek Slip-On, a waterproof adventure shoe that’s neither a sandal nor a slip-on.
These shoes, which appear to be Vans’ take on Crocs, promise to be printable, flexible, and long-lasting. Are they, nevertheless, at ease? To see for me, I put them to the test. The low profile and black-and-white checkerboard pattern of the first Vans Slip-On shoe, which debuted in 1977, are well-known. The Trek Slip-On is a spin on this well-known design and pattern, but it’s marketed as a water-friendly slip-on shoe made of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), a rubber-like material that’s good for the outdoors. They come in navy, black, olive, or an abstract pink pattern and are available in women’s sizes 5.5 to 10.5 and men’s sizes 4 to 13.
(the latter is a collaboration with American painter Chris Johanson). The price of each pair is $55. They’re ideal as a step up from barefoot, in my opinion. They’re not the type of shoe you want to wear for extended distances. However, if you’ve just finished surfing and are strolling around a parking lot, they are simple enough to slide on. If you require a water shoe or even a gardening shoe, I believe these are appropriate. They’re fantastic summer shoes because they’re lightweight and simple to clean. This shoe will flourish in any moist area that would be unsuitable for a regular shoe.
Good pair of Water Shoes
Every outdoor enthusiast understands the value of a good pair of water shoes. They provide traction and comfort while being easy to clean and carry, making trekking through wilderness streams or fast trips to the beach a breeze. The all-new Vans Trek is a contemporary, beach-ready slip-on that Spicoli would still approve of. It combines the appearance of their most famous silhouette with the utility of a specific chunky foam clog named after a lizard.
The result is a rinseable, go-anywhere adventure shoe that functions well and looks good while doing it. Developed with the help of the brand’s impressive surf team to inform on functionality and style, the result is a rinseable, go-anywhere adventure shoe that functions well and looks good while doing it. The Trek is made of lightweight, single-piece injected thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) plastic that bends for any type of outdoor activity and can be simply packed and stowed while on the way to adventure. It’s also extremely strong and robust, able to endure all types of bending and flexing.
Rubber slip-on shoes dotted with holes, dubbed the “rinsable” by Vans, are a first in the footwear industry. Crocs are not the only footwear that sounds like this, and you’re not the only one who thinks so. Crocs’ popular foam clogs have inspired a new shoe called the “Trek Slip-On,” which was secretly debuted last week. When it comes to the Crocs-inspired Vans, you either love it or you hate it—and even if you’re in the latter camp, you may fall in love with it no matter what. Compared to Crocs, the Trek Slip-On is a better choice for surfing and other beach activities because it is more likely to stay in place while you’re working out.
Vans Trek Slip-on Review
Vans’ move might be seen as vengeance for Crocs’ Citilane Roka court sneaker, which has encroached on Vans’ territory. Vans’ Trek Slip-On is crafted from a single injected piece of rubber, with an enormous sole with the same waffle traction that has been hugging skateboards for more than 50 years. This time around, Vans is touting its “go anywhere, do anything, rinsable slip-on” as the first of its kind. The Trek Slip-flexible On’s construction allows it to be folded up and transported with ease.
“How do you do fellow fucbois, we too produce rubber clogs,” tweeted a Wall Street Journal-style writer in response to Vans’ Croc-like shoe. A phenomenon comparable to Crocs’ so-ugly-it’s-good appeal has occurred among those who have called the shoe ugly: many of those who have said it is ugly now admit they want it. Now is the time to get your hands on a pair of ALT-CROCS! For $55, you can get your hands on a pair of Vans Trek Slip-Ons via the brand’s website or at any of its retail locations around the country.
Vans has already released army green, pink, blue, and black, but you can expect many more colorways to be released throughout the year. According to early reports, you should order a half-size smaller than your normal size. For the upcoming summer months, we strongly encourage you to wear a sandal or one of its various offshoots. Crocs or Cans? That’s up to us.
Is It Possible to Skate on These?
Traditional skating (ollies and flip tricks) is not something I would advocate for beginners. It’s not a good idea to use this if you plan on doing any tricks because of the rubber substance. However, I did put them to good use with my surf skates and cruisers. In my opinion, they’re better than nothing, but you won’t be using them for long-distance skating or flip tricks.
The Good and the Bad
Cleanability: Here are some advantages and disadvantages I’ve discovered after putting them through their paces. There isn’t a word for it. These are so disgusting that I don’t know how you can get them that filthy and then clean them out with water. I wore them in really muddy situations and washed them with a hose to restore them to new condition. It’s impossible to do with conventional Vans slip-on.
Breathability
To be completely honest, my feet stench after spending an extended period of time in closed-toe shoes. To keep my feet from going nuts as they would in a typical slip-on, I wear them.
Aesthetic
These shoes have a pleasing appearance to me, but that is purely a matter of taste. If Crocs were more my style, I would never wear them due to their unappealing appearance. Having something like this, however, is a welcome relief.
Distances Traveled
These were taken on a beach camping trip, as I described at the opening of this piece. For short excursions around the campground and even as a shower shoe, they were excellent. We went on a 6-mile hike, and I chose not to wear socks. I had five blisters on my feet by the time I reached the finish of the trip. Because of this, I would not recommend these shoes for hiking.
Sizing
There are two issues with the sizing. If you have wide feet, you may not be able to wear these shoes comfortably. I have medium-width feet, and these shoes suit me perfectly! Although it isn’t a deal-breaker, they are on the narrower end of the spectrum. In addition, these appear to be half a size too big. A half-size too big isn’t a big deal, but bear in mind that you might want to acquire something a half-size smaller than what you normally wear.
