Roe Vs Wade Decision Date 2022: What has happened since the final Roe v Wade opinion was released a week ago? The Supreme Court of the United States is considering overturning Roe v Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion across the United States, according to sources. As a result of the leak, which Politico published at midnight on May 2nd, there have been significant Demonstrations for and against abortion access protection.
Federal lawmakers have pledged to pursue a – ostensibly symbolic – attempt to codify the right to abortion in US law, while state legislators throughout the country have begun to plan for a post-Roe v Wade world. The Supreme Court has recognized the validity of the document and initiated an investigation into how it got out, despite the fact that it was not a final copy.
Here’s what happened in the week following the disclosure of the draught opinion:
Make a firm commitment to seeing federal legislation through. The news is certain to energize the forthcoming US midterm elections, which will determine the composition of the US Congress. Despite having a 435-seat House majority and a slender majority in the Senate’s 100 seats, Democrats lack the numbers to overcome a filibuster in that chamber’s 60-vote threshold. Nonetheless, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, has stated that a vote to entrench the right to abortion in US law will be held.
Prior to Roe v Wade, abortion legislation was left to the discretion of the states. The 1973 judgment defined abortion access to be a constitutionally protected right. If the decision is reversed, states will recover sovereignty over abortion access without the need for federal legislation.
Protesters support of abortion rights Demonstrate
Even with slim chances of achieving 60 votes in the chamber, where Democrats and independents who vote with Democrats hold 50 seats, Schumer called a vote on the legislation one of “the most important we ever take,” with Democratic brass noting that the vote would put legislators firmly on record about where they stand on the issue. The ongoing debate over removing filibustering and allowing most laws to pass with a simple majority in the Senate has gained new momentum as a result of the leak.
Republicans, for their part, have mostly avoided discussing abortion rights, focusing instead on the leak, with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell declaring that the act must be “investigated and punished to the fullest extent practical, the fullest extent conceivable.” Democrats were alarmed when McConnell said in an interview that if Republicans won control of Congress in the midterm elections, a national ban on abortion would be “feasible.”
States are preparing for a post-Roe world
The uproar over the leaked judgment has focused attention on states that have been planning for a post-Roe v Wade world for years. If Roe v Wade is repealed, around half of the US states are expected to enact abortion prohibitions or restrictions. Many state legislators have accelerated their work in anticipation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case that could overturn Roe v Wade.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 546 abortion restrictions will be introduced in 42 state legislatures by 2022. In 12 states, at least one chamber of the legislature has passed 32 restrictions, and 10 of those states have enacted 37 restrictions. At the time of the leak, 13 states had already enacted so-called trigger laws, which aim to prohibit virtually all abortions within state borders either immediately or within days of Roe v Wade’s end.
Which Criminalizes women and girls who seek Abortions
Another five states still have abortion bans in place from before Roe v Wade, but it’s unclear whether they’ll take effect right away or if authorities would enforce them. Despite the fact that many state legislatures were not in session at the time of the leak, state legislators have pledged to redouble their efforts to pass abortion-related legislation. Last week, the Louisiana House of Representatives adopted one of the most restrictive abortion bills in the country, which would criminalize women and girls who seek abortions.
Governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota has stated that if Roe v Wade is overturned, she will “immediately call for a special session to preserve lives and assure that every unborn child has a right to life in South Dakota.” Meanwhile, Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves declared that if Roe v Wade is overturned, the state’s trigger law will take effect, dismissing concerns that the state will try to restrict contraception if the decision is overturned. If Roe v Wade is overturned, state attorneys general in Missouri and Arkansas have said they will certify the trigger laws in their states. Abortion rights activists have seized on this opportunity to start a counter-campaign.
In recent years, at least 16 states have passed legislation guaranteeing the right to abortion. Meanwhile, Michigan’s attorney general has stated that if Roe v Wade is overturned, she will not enforce the state’s 1931 abortion ban, but has recognized that the state’s 83 local county prosecutors would be authorized to do so if they so chose. According to the Guttmacher Institute, which advocates for abortion rights, twenty-six states are assured or likely to restrict abortion if Roe v. Wade is overturned. Except for Texas, 22 states have previously enacted whole or near-total bans on the books now prohibited by Roe. The Supreme Court has already allowed the legislation barring it to take effect after six weeks due to the state’s unique civil enforcement system.
What do we know about the inquiry into the Leak?
Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court said last week that he has requested the court marshal to “initiate an investigation into the source of the leak.” There have been few details on the scope and scope of the investigation since then, with sources telling the Wall Street Journal that no marshal has yet begun an investigation into a leak. Some have speculated that the decision to engage the marshal rather than a government agency such as the FBI suggests a desire to keep the inquiry and its findings close at hand.
In the meanwhile, state law protects the right to abortion in sixteen states and the District of Columbia
In the event that Roe is overturned or seriously weakened, eight conservative states have already taken steps to restrict abortion access. Abortion is now a criminal in Oklahoma, thanks to a law passed last summer that makes it illegal to perform one. It, like numerous other anti-abortion bills passed this year in Republican-led states, has no exceptions for rape or incest, only to preserve the mother’s life. California has enacted laws making the surgery less expensive and is considering other measures to make itself an “abortion sanctuary”
if Roe is reversed, is one of eight Democratic-leaning states that have protected or expanded access to the procedure. Some court observers believed the document was genuine. “There are plenty of indicators the opinion is authentic,” tweeted veteran Supreme Court lawyer Neal Katyal, who worked as a clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer and thus has seen draughts. It would be difficult to fabricate an analysis with this scope and depth. It says it’s Alito’s work, and it sounds just like him.”
