Met Officer Julian Bennett Was Terminated For Refusing A Drug Test

Met Officer Julian Bennett

Met Officer Julian Bennett was terminated for refusing a drug test. In a recent turn of events, Senior Metropolitan Police officer Julian Bennett, who was known for developing the force’s anti-drug strategy, was fired for refusing to submit to a cannabis drug test. Let’s examine the specifics of this noteworthy development.

Key Points:

  • Senior Metropolitan Police officer Julian Bennett, responsible for crafting the force’s anti-drugs strategy, has been dismissed for refusing to undergo a cannabis drug test.
  • Bennett was accused by his former flatmate Sheila Gomes of using cannabis daily before heading to work at New Scotland Yard. The accusation was reported in July 2020, leading to an official inquiry.
  • Despite being cleared of smoking cannabis, Bennett was found guilty of gross misconduct for refusing to provide a urine sample for the drug test. This was deemed deliberate and intentional, seeking personal advantage or special treatment from the commissioner.
  • Bennett’s lawyer strongly defended him during the subsequent tribunal, characterizing Gomes as a “liar” and a “fantasist” aiming to profit from the allegations.
  • Bennett’s refusal to comply with the drug test was seen as damaging to the reputation of the Metropolitan Police Service, given his senior position.
  • His dismissal raises questions about equity in handling senior officers’ cases in comparison to more junior counterparts, particularly concerning pension entitlement.
  • Bennett’s legal team plans to appeal the gross misconduct decision, arguing that he did not consume drugs but was found guilty of refusing a drug test and alleged lack of integrity, which was not initially charged.
  • This extended legal battle, ongoing since July 2021, has incurred significant legal expenses, estimated at around £1.5 million, raising concerns about the efficiency of the disciplinary process within the Met.
  • The case has the potential to erode public trust in the police force, particularly in how drug test refusals are handled, emphasizing the need for timely resolutions in such matters.

Background of Julian Bennett:

Captain Julian Bennett, a veteran officer of the Metropolitan Police, had served with the force since 1976.
He was responsible for developing the anti-drug strategy for the Metropolitan Police from 2017 to 2021.

The Accusation

The saga began when his former flatmate, Sheila Gomes, accused Bennett of regularly using cannabis before going to work at New Scotland Yard.
In July of 2020, Gomes reported this alleged behavior, prompting an official investigation.

The Refusal

Bennett was asked, in the presence of an assistant commissioner, to provide a urine sample for drug testing.
He offered to resign immediately and requested a meeting with the then-commissioner, Dame Cressida Dick.

Gross Misconduct Finding

Bennett was found not guilty of marijuana use, but he was found guilty of gross misconduct for failing to provide a urine sample.
The disciplinary panel determined that his actions constituted deliberate and intentional behavior, as he sought personal gain and special treatment from the commissioner.

Legal Battle

During the subsequent tribunal, Bennett’s lawyer vehemently defended him, labeling Gomes as a “liar” and a “fantasist” who aimed to capitalize on the allegations.
The tribunal revealed Gomes’ litigation history and inconsistent accounting practices.

Impact on the Met

It was determined that Bennett’s refusal to submit to the drug test harmed the reputation of the Metropolitan Police Service.
His behavior was viewed as disrespectful and inconsiderate of the professional standards expected of police officers, particularly senior officers.

Pension Entitlement

Bennett, who is over 60 years old and was fired, is still entitled to a substantial pension, including a lump sum of £400,000 and monthly payments.
This has prompted discussions regarding the fair treatment of senior officers’ cases in comparison to their junior counterparts.

Appeal Planned

Bennett’s legal team plans to appeal the finding of gross misconduct.
They contend that he did not use drugs, but was found guilty of refusing a drug test and alleged lack of integrity, which were not initially charged.

Extended Legal Battle and Costs

This case, which has been ongoing since July 2021, has incurred substantial legal expenses, estimated at around £1.5 million.
The lengthy duration of the case has raised questions about the effectiveness of the Met’s disciplinary process.

Implications and Public Outrage

The public is likely to be outraged if a senior officer disobeys a lawful order to submit to a drug test, undermining public confidence in the police force. The case raises questions about the consistency with which drug test refusals are handled and the urgency with which such matters must be resolved.

In conclusion, the dismissal of Senior Met Officer Julian Bennett for refusing a drug test has raised serious concerns regarding the treatment of senior officers and the effectiveness of disciplinary procedures within the Metropolitan Police. It is unknown how Bennett’s appeal will affect the outcome of this case.