Skip to content

Where Is Pauline Hanson

Where Is Pauline Hanson: Pauline Lee Hanson (née Seccombe, initially Zagorski; born May 27, 1954) is a well-known Australian politician who founded and serves as the leader of One Nation, a right-wing populist political party in Australia. Since the 2016 Federal Election, Hanson has represented Queensland in the Australian Senate. In her native Ipswich, Queensland, Hanson ran a fish and chip shop before she decided to run for parliament.

Where Is Pauline Hanson
Where Is Pauline Hanson

She was preselected for the Division of Oxley in Brisbane, where she had been a member of the Liberal Party since 1995, for the 1996 federal election. She lost the endorsement of the Liberal Party just before the election because of her divisive comments towards Aboriginal Australians, but her name was still on the ballot. She won the election as an independent, took her seat, and joined One Nation in 1997, becoming the party’s lone MP. She made an unsuccessful attempt to switch to the Blair Division for the 1998 federal election.

Following her defeat in 1998, Pauline Hanson stood for office as the leader of One Nation, the United Australia Party, and as an independent. She was expelled from One Nation in 2002. Hanson was convicted of election fraud by a District Court jury in 2003, but three judges on the Queensland Court of Appeal later overturned that decision. She spent 11 weeks in jail before her appeal was heard.

After rejoining One Nation in 2013, Hanson was re-elected as leader in 2014. She and three other party members were re-elected to the Senate in the 2016 federal election after she narrowly lost the 2015 Queensland state election. She was re-elected in the 2022 federal elections.

Family court need reform, Pauline Hanson believes

Earlier this year, Senator Pauline Hanson asserted that fathers are unfairly treated by family courts because women fabricate claims of domestic abuse to deny them visitation rights with their children. Domestic violence victims may be reluctant to come forward for fear that their claims will not be taken seriously. She is leading the most recent parliamentary investigation into family courts as Hanson’s deputy chair. There are very few cases in which fathers are denied time with their children. Only 3% of all court orders in 2014 contained this.

Where Is Pauline Hanson
Where Is Pauline Hanson

Even more recently, in April of this year, the Australian Law Reform Commission finished its inquiry into family law. The administration’s 93 recommendations have not yet been implemented, nevertheless. Even if Dr. Hanson’s claims are untrue, there are still basic issues with the family court that need to be resolved if children’s best interests and those of victims of domestic violence are to be appropriately protected.

Equal responsibilities do not equate to equal time

Only 3% of divorcing parents litigate their child custody disputes in court. A recent survey found that more than half of those questioned had experienced either physical or emotional abuse. The vast majority of the time, both parents have equal parental obligations and are actively involved in their children’s lives. Former Prime Minister John Howard advocated for this in a 2003 House of Representatives report titled Every Picture Tells a Story. This suggestion led to this being made into law in 2006.

The notion of joint parental responsibility and a clause in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child both advocate joint parental responsibility for the upbringing of children. However, some Australians still hold the misconception that equitably shared parenting duty entails both parents spending an equal amount of time with the child. The Australian Law Reform Commission’s recommendation for the Family Law Act 1975 contains “joint decision making on significant long-term concerns” in place of “equal shared parental responsibility.”

High prices and prohibitively long Delays:

The hefty costs and protracted delays that litigants must contend with present significant problems as well. In every case, the Family Court of Australia allows plaintiffs to spend up to $100,000, according to a 2018 report. Additionally, it typically takes 17 months to get a case tried. Please take these estimates with a grain of salt. For certain meetings, it costs more and takes longer. Arguments may intensify as a result of the irritation this causes, endangering both parents and their children.

Where Is Pauline Hanson
Where Is Pauline Hanson

High costs have the potential to undermine financial stability. The family court system is made more difficult to access by a lack of access to legal aid. Due to the high costs of litigation or financial abuse against a party, people may be forced to represent themselves in court. In order to address these problems, increased government funding is required to take the weight off the underfunded court system and give money to registrars and family counselors. The family court system has to be changed as well.

Even though child welfare is a state responsibility, the family court is a federal entity

Child abuse, family violence, drug and alcohol abuse, and mental health issues are all too typical in family court cases today. An effective family court system requires teamwork and communication. However, family violence orders and child welfare are primarily the responsibility of the states and territories. The Family Court has limited authority to look into allegations of domestic violence and child abuse.

The Australian Law Reform Commission has recommended that state and territory-based family courts take the place of the federal Family Court. The only state-based family court in Australia is located in Western Australia. This is a substantial reform that would significantly affect how families in Australia are handled when seeking justice. By closing legal loopholes and integrating federal and state jurisdiction, family violence and child protection situations could be handled more effectively.

Outside of the Workplace:

Hanson lives on a sizable estate close to Beaudesert, Queensland. She also has a home in New South Wales’s Hunter Valley. During her first tenure in office, Hanson and her kids were frequently encircled by security personnel for extended periods of time each day. Hanson was almost totally accompanied to and from her children’s activities and school. In general, she kept her youngest children hidden from view. All of the mail received at Hanson’s office was taken to another area and scrutinized carefully before being returned. In 2006, Hanson acquired a real estate license.

Television appearances

Among the shows, Hanson appeared on in 2004 were Dancing with the Stars, Enough Rope, Who’s Got the Money, and This Is Your Life. Hanson was on Celebrity Apprentice in 2011. A documentary titled Pauline Hanson: The Story of a Woman Who Relaunched Her Party was produced by the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS) following the successful relaunch of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party in the 2016 federal Senate election, which saw four senators, including herself, elected. Educate us, please!

Instances of alleged sexual Harassment

On February 14, 2019, Senator Brian Burston accused Hanson of abusing him sexually. Burston said that Hanson “rubbed her fingers up my spine” in a 1998 incident after she was elected in 2016. Additionally, Hanson’s “malicious” text message to Burston’s wife, which implied he had feelings for another employee, was revealed in court. Hanson has already been charged with harassing a woman.

The arts:

Aboriginal artist Karla Dickens used Hanson’s face in the collage “Clown Nation” from her piece A Dickensian Country Show to depict Hanson. In conjunction with the 2020 Adelaide Biennial of Australian Art, it was on show at the Art Gallery of South Australia as a part of the “Monster Theatres” exhibition.